Aim: To analyze and compare the results of clinical usage of two protocols of bone drilling during the surgical stage of dental implantation. Materials and Methods: The clinical study group was formed from 30 patients. All selected patients underwent dental implantation in the lateral segments of the jaws using a delayed two-stage technique, using the standard drilling protocol (1000 rpm) and slow (50 rpm). The study included measuring implants' torque during the installation, bone density, and marginal bone resorption after 1,5 years. Results: The slow bone tissue preparation protocol showed the higher torque level during the installation, and did not cause significant changes in the structure of the bone tissue and level of sauserisation compared to the standard protocol for preparation. Conclusions: The usage of two different protocols showed a significant difference at the moment of installation. However, it did not reveal any statistically significant differences between the two sgroups of patients during the long-term follow-up.